Thursday, March 12, 2009

Google's Brandy Update


Like many smaller companies who run smaller websites was slightly affected by the Google "Brandy" (funniest name i heared so far) update. This update was pretty much nothing more than an added vote of confidence for larger more popular brands. Almost like a slight shove to the front of the line in the race for the best keyword phrases.

Recently Google's Matt Cutts talks about the update and as expected, he states that they aren't so much targetting brands as only certain elements were tweaked that gives this appearance. He also reiterates that it's only in certain query spaces that this is happening.
Matt put up a Vid to focuses on the 'Brandy' update.  have a look:





My take on all of this is the issue of semantics. Someone calls it an algorithm change while others are simply calling it a small update. The fact of the matter is that it makes absolutely no difference what you call it. Something changed!

It is pretty clear that some dial has been turned up or down and it seems like that dial is connected to characteristics shared by many big brand websites.
like, 
- for "airlines tickets" 
   spiceject, jetairways, goair, indigo 
   4 airlines recently began ranking for "airlines tickets".

- for "insurance & health insurance"
   sbi, mnyl, icici, lic, hdfc
   at least 60% of the first page of search results for insurace is owned by large national brands.

- for "watches"
   timex, maxima, titan
   3 watch brands jumped onto the first page of search results for watches.


Of course, we are not at the point yet that our psychological interpretation of a brand is being interpreted by Google. But there are clearly some factors that these brand websites have in a common and a couple of switches have been pulled and dials turned that use those signals to score results.

- Google is promoting brands for big money core category keywords.
So, Whats your take on this?


Monday, March 2, 2009

Future of Online Video

The future of Online Video looks bright.
There will be a growing number of opportunities of marketers in the online video space as the net and its technology evolves, and that’s really one place we’re headed now, besides the virtual online world.


You might have already seen this, but those of you who haven’t, I thought this was REALLY cool. This is a commercial called, “Dove Evolution”, a 75-second viral film created by Ogilvy & Mather, Toronto, was uploaded to YouTube on Oct. 6, 2006. Since than, it has been played more than 4 million times, got TV and Print media exposure, one of the most blogged about videos and more links than you can imagine. This was a campaign for real beauty for women and only cost about $50k to make! 4 million views and for $50k…good tradeoff?

Jay Adelson, CEO of Digg.com and Revision3.com, gave a very interesting presentation on what and where he thinks the online video advertising space is going. Now, he pointed out a major problem. There is no consensus in the industry as to what the standard should be to advertise in video (pre-roll, post-roll, etc.). Adelson displayed a video on the big screen as to how we can solve the problem of “annoying” the viewer, and suggested a great way to advertise in online video is…product placement IN the actual show, movie, commercial, etc. DiggNation podcast was also used as an example.

Adelson’s Example:



This video illustrated how to place a product, at the end of a show, without annoying the viewer and marketing the product or brand with more sense of reality and authenticity rather than a pop-up.